Conclusion: The Success of South Korea in Green Transportation.
Korea
acknowledges the importance of cycling and some cities implemented successfully
bike sharing programs. Bicycle ownership is also relatively high with 166 bikes
per 1000 persons. Nevertheless, the bicycle modal split is extremely low (in
2005 it was at 1.2 % and it didn’t change much since then). So far, Korean
cities developed master plans and they tried to integrate bikes with public
transport through bicycle parking facilities near subway stations. Korea has a
national bicycle master plan. Cities are closing streets on weekend to get
people on their bikes or on their feet.
Metro System in Seoul
In
terms of efficiency the most environmentally friendly mass transit method is
rail. If you don’t count in the suburban rail lines of Tokyo, then Seoul’s metro
has the busiest metro system of the world. The first subway line was opened in
1975. There have been two phases of investments into rail transit in the
capital area: Phase 1 (1971-1994) and Phase 2 (1990-2000) (yeah, it somehow
overlaps) costed together 120 trillion won (110 billion USD) and the national
government carried costs. Now, Seoul Metropolitan Government or private
partners must finance line extensions. The government acts still as a partially
sponsor (up to 50%). Metro Line No. 9 was realized thanks to a public-private
partnership.
Korean Bus System
I like
to think about Seoul’s bus reform of 2004 as what we Westerners associate with
before and after Christ. The change to a semi-public operation system improved
the service and efficiency of public buses. The satisfaction of users proved
its success. Buses remain operated by private companies, but Seoul decides on
the routes, schedules and fares. Each company gets reimbursed on a vehicle kilometers-scheme instead on a passenger-count-system (like it was before).
This reform brought also the Smart Card system and intelligent transport system
along.
Transit-Oriented Development
Curitiba?
Bogota? Forget these examples of TOD. The real role model should be Seoul. Near
public transport nodes you can find a high density of retail and businesses.
General density is already very high in Korea but close to transport hubs,
there is a clear concentration of uses. It could be further improved by a
better connectivity to bicycle transport and walking.
Barrier-Free Transport
There
are a couple of laws which try to focus on the vulnerable, weak transport
users. All facilities are being upgraded and access to buses and metros is in
the progress to become easier.
Parking in Korea’s Urban Areas
The
report mentions briefly the parking policy of Korea. It says that the intention
was to reduce parking space in city centers with the goal to promote usage of
public transport. Park-and-ride and high parking charges are also helping.
Conclusion for Sustainable
Transportation in Korea
Korea
has mainly four measures to promote environmentally friendly transport:
- High investments into rail transit.
- Transport demand management through congestion fees in Seoul (like Namsan tunnels).
- Public transport reform in 2004 and the ongoing integration with of public transport modes in the capital.
- Fuel tax to maintain transport facilities.
Their conclusion summarizes the process of
sustainable urban transport for East Asia. I hope that you saw in this post
that Seoul puts a lot of efforts to advance to a more sustainable stage of
transportation. There’s still a lot improvement possible and needed!
Post by Muhammad Azim



Comments
Post a Comment